1982 Skoda L vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (572 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 528 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (754 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 680 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Skoda L | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Skoda | Chevrolet |
| Model | L | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1046 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 572 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 754 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 72 L |
