1982 Skoda Rapid R vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 1,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Skoda Rapid R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda Rapid R.
Because 1982 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Skoda Rapid R | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Skoda | Nissan |
Model | Rapid R | Pixo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1287 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2360 mm |