1982 Subaru Rex vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Subaru Rex. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Subaru Rex would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1982 Subaru Rex. (31 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1982 Subaru Rex.
Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Subaru Rex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Subaru Rex. (44 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Subaru Rex.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Subaru Rex | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Subaru | Holden |
Model | Rex | Colorado |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 544 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 44 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |