1982 Subaru Rex vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Subaru Rex. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Subaru Rex would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 235 more horse power than 1982 Subaru Rex. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1982 Subaru Rex.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Subaru Rex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 546 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Subaru Rex. (54 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Subaru Rex.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Subaru Rex | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Subaru | Jaguar |
Model | Rex | XF |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 665 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 54 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2908 mm |