1982 Suzuki Cervo vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 394 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 2011 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Suzuki Cervo | 2011 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Audi |
| Model | Cervo | R8 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 538 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1245 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2649 mm |
