1982 Suzuki Cervo vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 331 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 478 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Suzuki Cervo | 2011 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Suzuki | Holden |
| Model | Cervo | UTE |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 538 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
