1982 Suzuki Cervo vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 1982 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Suzuki Cervo | 2012 Renault Megane | |
Make | Suzuki | Renault |
Model | Cervo | Megane |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 538 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |