1982 Talbot Samba vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Talbot Samba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Talbot Samba would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1982 Talbot Samba. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1982 Talbot Samba. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1072 kg more than 1982 Talbot Samba. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Talbot Samba. (64 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Talbot Samba.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Talbot Samba | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Talbot | Cadillac |
Model | Samba | STS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2957 mm |