1982 Toyota Celica vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 1,972 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (103 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 84 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Celica | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Celica | 1800 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1972 cc | 1774 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 106 mm |
| Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2550 mm |
