1982 Toyota Celica vs. 1976 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Triumph Stag weights approximately 30 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Triumph Stag (234 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1976 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Celica | 1976 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Celica | Stag |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 2997 cc |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 234 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2550 mm |
