1982 Toyota Celica vs. 2003 Acura RSX
To start off, 2003 Acura RSX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura RSX weights approximately 42 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Acura RSX. (191 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Celica | 2003 Acura RSX | |
| Make | Toyota | Acura |
| Model | Celica | RSX |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1222 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2540 mm |
