1982 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Celica | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Toyota | Audi |
| Model | Celica | TT |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2469 mm |
