1982 Toyota Cressida vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Cressida. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Cressida.
Because 1982 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Cressida. (162 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Cressida | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Cressida | C70 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
