1982 Toyota Crown vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,759 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C30 weights approximately 41 kg more than 1982 Toyota Crown.
Because 1982 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Toyota Crown | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Crown | C30 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2759 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1457 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2640 mm |