1982 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,955 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser (154 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 290 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser. (300 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Land Cruiser | Celica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3955 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 622 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2440 mm |