1982 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser. (154 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 236 kg more than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser. (300 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Land Cruiser | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3955 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1664 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3198 mm |
