1982 Toyota Model F vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Model F would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 151 kg more than 1982 Toyota Model F.
Because 1982 Toyota Model F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Toyota Model F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Model F. (140 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Model F.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Model F | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Model F | C30 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2639 mm |
