1982 Toyota Starlet vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 1982 Toyota Starlet is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Volvo 220 (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Starlet. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Volvo 220 should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Starlet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Volvo 220 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1982 Toyota Starlet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Starlet | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Starlet | 220 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 695 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |
