1982 Toyota Starlet vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Starlet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Starlet would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (268 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Starlet. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Starlet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1447 kg more than 1982 Toyota Starlet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Toyota Starlet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Toyota Starlet | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Starlet | XC90 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 695 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 72 L |