1982 Toyota Starlet vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Starlet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Starlet would be higher. At 2,438 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Condor (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Starlet. (57 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Starlet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 715 kg more than 1982 Toyota Starlet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (196 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Starlet. (91 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Starlet.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Toyota Starlet | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Starlet | Condor |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 91 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1495 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2660 mm |