1982 Toyota Starlet vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Starlet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Starlet would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 495 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Starlet. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Starlet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1219 kg more than 1982 Toyota Starlet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Starlet | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
| Model | Starlet | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 548 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 695 kg | 1914 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1884 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |
