1982 Toyota Tercel vs. 2010 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2010 Dodge Viper is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 8,400 cc (10 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Viper weights approximately 747 kg more than 1982 Toyota Tercel.
Because 2010 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Tercel | 2010 Dodge Viper | |
| Make | Toyota | Dodge |
| Model | Tercel | Viper |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 8400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 600 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1567 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1234 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2510 mm |
