1982 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2006 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa (153 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (75 Nm). This means 2006 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Volkswagen Polo | 2006 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Volkswagen | Daewoo |
Model | Polo | Tocsa |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1043 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 75 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |