1982 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (75 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Volkswagen Polo | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Holden |
| Model | Polo | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1043 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2685 mm |
