1982 Volkswagen Scirocco vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Scirocco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Scirocco would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Scirocco. (112 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Scirocco. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 610 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Scirocco. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volkswagen Scirocco. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Scirocco. (159 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Scirocco. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1982 Volkswagen Scirocco has manual transmission. 1982 Volkswagen Scirocco will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Volkswagen Scirocco 2013 Cadillac ATS
Make Volkswagen Cadillac
Model Scirocco ATS
Year Released 1982 2013
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 112 HP 268 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 159 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front AWD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 920 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4643 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]