1982 Volvo 265 vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1982 Volvo 265 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,848 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 265 (153 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 265 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 265 (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Volvo 265 | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Volvo | Zastava |
Model | 265 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 2848 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2430 mm |