1982 Volvo 360 vs. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 490 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Volvo 360 | 1997 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Volvo | Chevrolet |
| Model | 360 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1986 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2570 mm |
