1982 Zastava 102 vs. 1979 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Zastava 2101 (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Zastava 2101 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Zastava 2101 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 2101. (88 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Zastava 102 | 1979 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Zastava | Zastava |
Model | 102 | 2101 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 95 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2430 mm |