1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2010 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2010 Ford Maverick is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Maverick (194 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Maverick weights approximately 835 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Maverick (265 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Zastava 102 | 2010 Ford Maverick | |
Make | Zastava | Ford |
Model | 102 | Maverick |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 95 Nm | 265 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1605 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2630 mm |