1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2010 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2010 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 1322 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 2010 Mercury Mountaineer | |
| Make | Zastava | Mercury |
| Model | 102 | Mountaineer |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 344 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 2092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1826 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2888 mm |
