1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse (162 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse weights approximately 725 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| Make | Zastava | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 102 | Eclipse |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1495 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1367 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2576 mm |
