1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2010 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2010 Nissan Frontier is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,952 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Frontier (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 672 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Frontier (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 2010 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | Zastava | Nissan |
| Model | 102 | Frontier |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 3952 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 3200 mm |
