1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 432 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Zastava | Honda |
| Model | 102 | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2436 mm |
