1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2011 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2011 Seat Exeo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Seat Exeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Seat Exeo (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Seat Exeo should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Seat Exeo weights approximately 630 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Seat Exeo (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Seat Exeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 2011 Seat Exeo | |
| Make | Zastava | Seat |
| Model | 102 | Exeo |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4661 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1772 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2642 mm |
