1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Zastava | Mazda |
| Model | 102 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2639 mm |
