1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2013 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2013 GMC Sierra is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Sierra (355 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1669 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Sierra (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 470 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 2013 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Zastava | GMC |
| Model | 102 | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 355 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 565 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 2439 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5847 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2032 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1872 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 3645 mm |
