1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2013 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2013 Subaru Forester is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Subaru Forester (168 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Forester weights approximately 758 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Subaru Forester (236 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 2013 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Zastava | Subaru |
| Model | 102 | Forester |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1528 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2006 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2615 mm |
