1982 Zastava 132 vs. 2010 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford S-Max is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford S-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford S-Max (202 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 132. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 132.
Because 1982 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Zastava 132 | 2010 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Zastava | Ford |
Model | 132 | S-Max |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1756 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |