1982 Zastava 1500 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Epica

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 575 kg more than 1982 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (195 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 1500. 2006 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: