1982 Zastava 1500 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 421 kg more than 1982 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: