1982 Zastava 1500 vs. 2013 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2013 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 1500 would be higher.
Because 1982 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Suzuki SX4 has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Suzuki SX4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 1500 | 2013 Suzuki SX4 | |
| Make | Zastava | Suzuki |
| Model | 1500 | SX4 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | automatic |
