1982 Zastava 2101 vs. 2011 Mazda 6

To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,183 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 6 (127 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 6 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1982 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 6 (340 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 2101. 2011 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: