1982 Zastava 2101 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1117 kg more than 1982 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (361 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 2101. 2013 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: