1982 Zastava 750 vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd

To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 697 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Cee'd (186 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: