1982 Zastava 750 vs. 2011 BMW X3

To start off, 2011 BMW X3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW X3 (240 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 BMW X3 weights approximately 1225 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2011 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW X3 (299 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750. 2011 BMW X3 has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 BMW X3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: