1982 Zastava 750 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750.
Because 1982 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Zastava 750 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Zastava | Nissan |
Model | 750 | Micra |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 55 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2449 mm |