1982 Zastava 750 vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage

To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (430 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 397 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage weights approximately 970 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (489 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: