1983 Abarth A 112 vs. 1952 Austin A 30
To start off, 1983 Abarth A 112 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 965 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Abarth A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Abarth A 112 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1952 Austin A 30.
Because 1952 Austin A 30 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 30. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Abarth A 112 | 1952 Austin A 30 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | A 112 | A 30 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 803 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 29 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |