1983 Abarth A 112 vs. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II
To start off, 1983 Abarth A 112 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II weights approximately 473 kg more than 1983 Abarth A 112.
Because 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Abarth A 112 | 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk II | |
Make | Abarth | Austin-Healey |
Model | A 112 | 3000 Mk II |
Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1158 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2340 mm |