1983 Abarth A 112 vs. 1963 Abarth 1600
To start off, 1983 Abarth A 112 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Abarth 1600 weights approximately 59 kg more than 1983 Abarth A 112.
Because 1963 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Abarth A 112 | 1963 Abarth 1600 | |
| Make | Abarth | Abarth |
| Model | A 112 | 1600 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2100 mm |
